June 15, 2011 @ 12:04 a.m.
The code on the server as of now:
- Fixes bug where sometimes you would guess a word and it would clear, but then the quiz wouldn't end and the word would show up as missed.
- Fixes bug where repeats are shown at the end (missed list)
- Fixes various other concurrency bugs.
- Increases non-member saved list limit from 5000 to 15000
- Increases upload list limit to 2000 (will increase this further once I figure out how to use a good job queueing mechanism)
- Should slightly increase the overall speed of everything.
Please log in to comment on this post!
Comments
dbl (June 16, 2011 @ 7:09 a.m.)
Hi,
I also noticed a great new feature, worth publicizing (assuming it is intentional).
After taking a quiz and missing some words, pressing Start again does a quiz on just those missed words.
Repeat until 100% !
cesar (June 16, 2011 @ 8:33 a.m.)
dbl, this feature was also on the original desktop app, but maybe some people don't know about it. Thank you!
knitz (June 16, 2011 @ 12:24 p.m.)
Hi - I really like the changes you've made so far. Just wondering why you reduced the time we used to have on 3s and 4s? I just don't type fast enough
odradek (June 17, 2011 @ 12:03 a.m.)
Hi - I just happened to notice that emicant wasn't marked as csw only.
cesar (June 17, 2011 @ noon)
it should mark it in the 'solutions' pop-up but yeah, i need to add it to the box under your name
odradek (June 17, 2011 @ 1:06 p.m.)
no, that was my point - it's unmarked in the solutions box.
odradek (June 17, 2011 @ 1:16 p.m.)
alphagram 1773 in the csw list, though maybe this number shifts because it was 1765 yesterday. If I do an OWL quiz, nematic gets no anagram, but in a csw quiz, emicant is definitely unmarked.
cesar (June 17, 2011 @ 1:28 p.m.)
that's really strange, the number should definitely not switch. i will look into it later today.
cesar14w (June 17, 2011 @ 8:17 p.m.)
hi odradek, where did you get the number 1765 from? on my database it shows up as 1773 for that alphagram. You are right about it not having the # symbol. I have no idea why, I'm going to look into it...
cesar14w (June 17, 2011 @ 8:23 p.m.)
crazy bug. it's been messed up all the way since aerolith 0.9b. it must be in that code somehow.. urgh. time to debug.
odradek (June 17, 2011 @ 9:08 p.m.)
I guess the 1765 was just the lower end of the range I selected when trying to track down the word the night before - & that value saved in the text box as a suggestion... could have sworn I chose 1750-1800 though.